Math Mapgenerated 2026-10-25 · a354234
PUBLIC BUILD

Ostrowski's theorem — flashcards

Every card the map can derive about Ostrowski's theorem — definitions, statements, attribution, and the edges it sits on.

19 cards. Click a question to reveal the answer — this uses no scripting, so the deck works with JavaScript disabled and prints as a plain question-and-answer list.

This deck is generated. No card was written for the deck: each one is derived from a node in the registry by a stated rule, and names its source underneath the answer. Correct the statement and the card follows.

Download as CSV — columns Category, Front, Back, Source, for Anki or any spaced-repetition tool.

Definitions 2

Define: The p-adic absolute value.

|x|_p = p^−v_p(x) for x ≠ 0, and |0|_p = 0. Divisibility by a high power of p is what it means to be small.

derived from st/def-absolute-value by the statement rule

Define: The absolute value axioms.

An absolute value on a field satisfies |x| = 0 exactly when x = 0, |xy| = |x||y|, and |x + y| ≤ |x| + |y|. Ostrowski's theorem is the statement that on ℚ these three conditions have far fewer solutions than one would guess.

derived from st/def-abs-axioms by the statement rule

Theorems 3

State: Ostrowski's theorem.

Every nontrivial absolute value on ℚ is equivalent either to the ordinary absolute value or to a p-adic one for exactly one prime p.

derived from st/ostrowski by the statement rule

State: The product formula.

For nonzero rational x, the ordinary absolute value times the product of all p-adic ones equals 1. Every place is accounted for, and no single one is privileged.

derived from st/product-formula by the statement rule

State: The places of ℚ do not compare.

Nearness in |·|_p and nearness in |·|_∞ are unrelated: by Ostrowski the absolute values are inequivalent, so neither induces any information about the other. Asking whether a p-adic number is larger than a real one has no content.

derived from st/incomparable-places by the statement rule

Names and dates 5

Ostrowski's theorem — who, and when?

Alexander Ostrowski, 1916.

derived from st/ostrowski by the attribution rule

The product formula — who, and when?

Artin and Whaples, 1945.

derived from st/product-formula by the attribution rule

The p-adic absolute value — who, and when?

Kurt Hensel, 1897.

derived from st/def-absolute-value by the attribution rule

The absolute value axioms — who, and when?

József Kürschák, 1912.

derived from st/def-abs-axioms by the attribution rule

The places of ℚ do not compare — who, and when?

Alexander Ostrowski, 1916.

derived from st/incomparable-places by the attribution rule

Formalisation 2

What is Ostrowski's theorem called in Mathlib?

Rat.AbsoluteValue.equiv_real_or_padic — Mathlib.NumberTheory.Ostrowski

derived from st/ostrowski by the binding rule

What is The p-adic absolute value called in Mathlib?

padicNorm — Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicNorm

derived from st/def-absolute-value by the binding rule

Connections 6

Under the Degeneracy lens, how do Ostrowski's theorem and Peano arithmetic relate? [Degeneracy]

Being an integer is what survives every valuation at once — a condition imposed on a larger object, not a starting point that everything else is built up from.

derived from degeneracy:ostrowski→peano by the connection rule

Under the Degeneracy lens, how do Ostrowski's theorem and Differentiation & integration relate? [Degeneracy]

The reals are the completion at the infinite place. Being the ambient number system you happened to grow up with is a fact about pedagogy, not about ℝ.

derived from degeneracy:ostrowski→elementary-calculus by the connection rule

Ostrowski's theorem and p-adic numbers look like one thing. What separates them? [Forks]

Ostrowski's theorem says the branches are exactly ℝ and one ℚₚ per prime. This is the cleanest fork in mathematics: infinitely many consistent completions of the same starting object, and no principled reason to privilege the real one.

derived from forks:ostrowski→p-adic-numbers by the connection rule

Ostrowski's theorem and Differentiation & integration look like one thing. What separates them? [Forks]

Ordinary analysis is what you get by taking the one branch we happen to live on. Naming it a branch rather than the default is the whole point of the lens.

derived from forks:ostrowski→elementary-calculus by the connection rule

In Mathlib, what is the import relation between Ostrowski's theorem and Differentiation & integration? [Dependency (Mathlib)]

`Mathlib.NumberTheory.Ostrowski` imports `Mathlib.Analysis.AbsoluteValue.Equivalence`, `Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Base`, `Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Continuity`. Read off Mathlib/NumberTheory/Ostrowski.html. No human asserted this edge.

derived from dependency:ostrowski→elementary-calculus by the connection rule

In Mathlib, what is the import relation between Ostrowski's theorem and p-adic numbers? [Dependency (Mathlib)]

`Mathlib.NumberTheory.Ostrowski` imports `Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicNorm`. Read off Mathlib/NumberTheory/Ostrowski.html. No human asserted this edge.

derived from dependency:ostrowski→p-adic-numbers by the connection rule

Concepts 1

What is Ostrowski's theorem, in one sentence?

Every absolute value on ℚ is equivalent to the ordinary one or to a p-adic one. This is the fork itself: it says exactly what the branches are and that there are no others.

derived from ostrowski by the concept rule