run 118Settled
../lab/runs/118-prime-centralisers-of-the-monster.mdPrediction(A) the primes appearing in the majority P are exactly {3, 5, 7, 11}. (B) the S at p = 11 is M₁₂, and no other prime's S is a Mathieu group (M₁₁, M₁₂, M₂₂, M₂₃, M₂₄). Both scored; confirmed if both hold.
Falsifier(A) the set of primes differs from {3, 5, 7, 11}; (B) S at p = 11 is not M₁₂, or a Mathieu group appears at another prime. Unanticipated: the three readers disagree on more than two classes (the instrument cannot settle the table; recorded, and the question goes to the GAP library as a computation). Withdrawn if control (i) fails.
The reader prompt, fixed:
> You are a reader with web access. Do not read any file in a repository or on this machine; use only the web. Question: for every prime p dividing the order of the Monster group M, and every conjugacy class pX of elements of order p in M, what is the structure of the centraliser C_M(pX)? Give each as it is written in the ATLAS of Finite Groups or the GAP character table library (for example "2·B", "3 × Th", "2^{1+24}·Co₁"), with a source URL per class, and say whether you read the page or only a search summary. Then list separately the classes whose centraliser is a direct product p × S with S a sporadic simple group. No interpretation; under 400 words.
Reports verbatim in R28_reading/118/readers118.md; the table in RESULTS118.md.
As written. The scoring reader sees this file above "Not part of the seal" and RESULTS118.md.
confirmedScored by a blind reader given the seal above the "Not part of the seal" heading and R28_reading/118/RESULTS118.md. Controls held. (A) and (B) held on the majority: 3C, 5A, 7A by all three readers from stated sources; 11A by two of three, both derived. No falsifier, no unanticipated case (one class of disagreement on membership).
Faults in the seal's wording (the reader's five, kept): "the reader gives" did not say whether a structure a reader worked out counts, while the prompt asked for structures "as written" — the confirmation turns on that word, and under the stricter reading the run is falsified; "disagree on more than two classes" did not say on what (on structure, readers 1 and 3 derived ten classes where reader 2 gave orders only); control (ii) had no consequence and did not separate citing the structure from citing data it was derived from; a missing class (reader 2's 11A) had no rule; a Mathieu group in a minority set would be unscored. Instrument: every page reached through a summarising fetch; no reader saw the ATLAS or GAP text.
Reading (the codifier's, after the score): the guess held, and the record should carry its weight honestly: 11 × M₁₂ is a two-line derivation (the normaliser (11:5 × M₁₂):2 has order 110·|M₁₂|, the centraliser has index 10 in it and order 11·|M₁₂|, so it is 11 × M₁₂), which is why two readers made it, and it is not on any page the readers reached. The fact behind it is what matters for the forest: the four sporadic centralisers of prime-order elements are Th, HN, He, M₁₂, at 3, 5, 7, 11, and only the last is also a stabiliser in the Golay code. The next question (guesses 2 and 3 of 09:45) is whether the 11-element and the dodecad are one object; that needs the GAP library or an argument, not readers.
generated 2026-10-25the lab index